Urgent vs. planned peritoneal dialysis initiation: complications and outcomes in the first year of therapy / Diálise peritoneal de início urgente versus planejado: complicações e desfechos no primeiro ano de terapia

Abstract Introduction: Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (US-PD) has been proposed as a safe modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with an indication for emergency dialysis initiation. We aimed to compare the characteristics, 30-day complications, and clinical outcomes of US-PD and planned peritoneal dialysis (Plan-PD) patients over the first year of therapy. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study that included incident adult patients followed for up to one year. US-PD was considered when incident patients started therapy within 7 days after Tenckhoff catheter implantation. Plan-PD group consisted of patients who started therapy after the breaking period (15 days). Mechanical and infectious complications were compared 30 days from PD initiation. Hospitalization and technique failure during the first 12 months on PD were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and the determinants were calculated by Cox regression models. Results: All patients starting PD between October/2016 and November/2019 who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were analyzed. We evaluated 137 patients (70 in the US-PD x 67 Plan-PD). The main complications in the first 30 days were catheter tip migration (7.5% Plan-PD x 4.3% US-PD - p= 0.49) and leakage (4.5% Plan-PD x 5.7% US-PD - p=0.74). Most catheters were placed using the Seldinger technique. The main cause of dropout was death in US-PD patients (15.7%) and transfer to HD in Plan-PD patients (13.4%). The occurrence of complications in the first 30 days was the only risk factor for dropout (OR = 2.9; 95% CI 1.1-7.5, p = 0.03). Hospitalization rates and technique survival were similar in both groups. Conclusion: The lack of significant differences in patients' outcomes between groups reinforces that PD is a safe and applicable dialysis method in patients who need immediate dialysis.

Resumo Introdução: A diálise peritoneal de início urgente (US-PD) foi proposta como modalidade segura de terapia renal substitutiva (TRS) para pacientes com doença renal em estágio 5 (DRC-5) com indicação de início de diálise de emergência. Buscamos comparar características, complicações em 30 dias e desfechos clínicos de pacientes em US-PD e diálise peritoneal planejada (DP-plan) no primeiro ano de terapia. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo de centro único, que incluiu pacientes adultos incidentes em DP acompanhados por até um ano. Considerou-se US-PD quando os pacientes iniciaram terapia até 7 dias após implante do cateter Tenckhoff. O grupo DP-plan consistiu de pacientes iniciando terapia após período break-in (15 dias). Compararam-se complicações mecânicas e infecciosas 30 dias após o início da DP. Hospitalização e falha da técnica durante os primeiros 12 meses em terapia foram avaliados por curvas Kaplan-Meier e os seus determinantes foram analisados por modelos de regressão de Cox. Resultados: Analisaram-se todos os pacientes iniciando DP entre Outubro/2016-Novembro/2019 que preencheram os critérios de inclusão. Avaliamos 137 pacientes (70 US-PD x 67 DP-plan). As principais complicações nos primeiros 30 dias foram migração da ponta do cateter (7,5% DP-plan x 4,3% US-PD - p= 0,49) e extravasamento (4,5% DP-plan x 5,7% US-PD - p=0,74). A maioria dos cateteres foi implantada pela técnica de Seldinger. A principal causa de saída da terapia foi óbito em pacientes em US-PD (15,7%) e transferência para HD em pacientes em DP-plan (13,4%). A ocorrência de complicações nos primeiros 30 dias foi o único fator de risco para saída da terapia (OR = 2,9; IC 95% 1,1-7,5, p = 0,03). Taxas de hospitalização e sobrevida da técnica foram similares em ambos os grupos. Conclusão: A ausência de diferenças significativas nos desfechos dos pacientes entre os grupos reforça que DP é um método de diálise seguro e aplicável em pacientes que necessitam diálise imediata.

Urgent vs. planned peritoneal dialysis initiation: complications and outcomes in the first year of therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (US-PD) has been proposed as a safe modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with an indication for emergency dialysis initiation. We aimed to compare the characteristics, 30-day complications, and clinical outcomes of US-PD and planned peritoneal dialysis (Plan-PD) patients over the first year of therapy. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study that included incident adult patients followed for up to one year. US-PD was considered when incident patients started therapy within 7 days after Tenckhoff catheter implantation. Plan-PD group consisted of patients who started therapy after the breaking period (15 days). Mechanical and infectious complications were compared 30 days from PD initiation. Hospitalization and technique failure during the first 12 months on PD were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and the determinants were calculated by Cox regression models. RESULTS: All patients starting PD between October/2016 and November/2019 who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were analyzed. We evaluated 137 patients (70 in the US-PD x 67 Plan-PD). The main complications in the first 30 days were catheter tip migration (7.5% Plan-PD x 4.3% US-PD - p= 0.49) and leakage (4.5% Plan-PD x 5.7% US-PD - p=0.74). Most catheters were placed using the Seldinger technique. The main cause of dropout was death in US-PD patients (15.7%) and transfer to HD in Plan-PD patients (13.4%). The occurrence of complications in the first 30 days was the only risk factor for dropout (OR = 2.9; 95% CI 1.1-7.5, p = 0.03). Hospitalization rates and technique survival were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The lack of significant differences in patients' outcomes between groups reinforces that PD is a safe and applicable dialysis method in patients who need immediate dialysis.

Troca valvar mitral minimamente invasiva videoassistida / Vídeo-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve replacement

A utilização de técnicas minimamente invasivas em cirurgia cardíaca vem sendo amplamente discutida em nosso meio, visando melhorias não só no aspecto estético, mas também funcional. Neste relato, apresentamos o caso de um paciente portador de estenose valvar mitral grave, submetido à troca valvar mitral minimamente invasiva videoassistida com sucesso.

The use of minimally invasive technics in cardiac surgery has become widely discussed, aiming improvements not only in the aesthetics aspects but also better functional results. In this report, we present a case of a patient with severe mitral stenosis that underwent succesful video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve replacement.

Vídeo-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve replacement.

The use of minimally invasive technics in cardiac surgery has become widely discussed, aiming improvements not only in the aesthetics aspects but also better functional results. In this report, we present a case of a patient with severe mitral stenosis that underwent successful video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve replacement.